What incentive conflict was being controlled by these loyalty payments
This week\\\’s discussion will provide you with an opportunity to apply Froeb\\\’s analytic method. So now practice Froeb\\\’s rule. Assume the actors behaved rationally. What went wrong?
Robinson-Patman Act of 1936, also called the Anti-Price Discrimination Act, U.S. law enacted in 1936 that protects businesses from being driven out of the marketplace by prohibiting discrimination in pricing, promotional allowances. Payment to HB by Intel violates the Federal Trade Commission\\\’s unfair competition in the marketplace.
Read the example in the discussion instructions while keeping in mind the following questions:
Who made the bad decision?
What information did they have? And was it good, bad, or unclear?
What was their incentive?
Instructions
Read the following and then respond to the discussion prompt.
Intel made large loyalty payments to HP in exchange for HP buying most of their chips from Intel instead of rival AMD. AMD sued Intel under the antitrust laws, and Intel settled the case by paying $1.25 billion to AMD.
Address the following in your discussion post:
What incentive conflict was being controlled by these loyalty payments? What advice did Intel ignore when they adopted this practice (consider how the Robinson-Patman Act applies to their practice) and speculate why Intel ignored the advice.Note: In your discussion posts for this course, do not rely on Wikipedia, Investopedia, or any similar website as a reference or supporting source.To earn full credit for your discussion, you must complete one post
Answer preview to what incentive conflict was being controlled by these loyalty payments
APA
321 words
