Much of the frustration and anger that comes from disagreement, in-groups and out-groups

MID TERM PAPER 

I think by now, you might see that definitions are fluid and when relative to morality and opinion, there is no agreement at all. Something as simple as right and wrong can differ greatly across cultural boundaries and create not only misunderstanding but also anger. Relativism would have no absolutes and all things a matter of individual preferences. That may work in the “moral” dimension but in the “legal” world, it may not fly. Much of the frustration and anger that comes from disagreement, in-groups and out-groups, leads to large scale violence. There are two areas in which to reconcile right and wrong, the moral framework or the legal framework. For two people to be in agreement they must be using the same standard. Explain the difference and similarities between the two frameworks and respond to this question: In such a diverse country (USA) with so many different viewpoints and backgrounds how does one determine what is right and what is wrong, AND who decides who is right and who is wrong.
5-7 pages, APA style

See below

From RICHARD: this one I recommended you^ This is my personal friend…so you have to write a good essay for him …do you see? Attached are papers I did for him before.

 medicine man African Religions Elias Atie

APA

1779 words