From the e-Activity, summarize at least two (2) arguments presented for and against granting Sandusky’s

Home » Downloads » From the e-Activity, summarize at least two (2) arguments presented for and against granting Sandusky’s

From the e-Activity, summarize at least two (2) arguments presented for and against granting Sandusky’s

From the e-Activity, summarize at least two (2) arguments presented for and against granting Sandusky’s motion for a new criminal trial. Identify the most likely factors that you believe would support the judge’s decision to grant a new trial. Provide a rationale for your response.(100 words)

In the event that Sandusky were to be granted a new trial, discuss two (2) specific aspects of the case that you believe the defense and prosecuting attorneys would alter in their new arguments. Provide a rationale for your response.(100 words)

 

Week 6 Discussion 2

“Personal Values” Please respond to the following:

 

  • John, a married, law-abiding, father of two children is serving as a juror in a trial where a child had been murdered. Determine the significant impact that a juror from the described demographic could potentially have in the outcome of this particular criminal trial.  Provide rationale in your response (100 words).
  • Analyze at least three (3) overall differences between criminal and civil court proceedings. Discuss the fundamental reasons why you believe that these differences are the most notable. Justify your response.(100 words)

 

Week 6 discussion 2

“Families and Education” Please respond to the following:

  • The definition of marriage has changed over the past years and the recent Supreme Court ruling. Review Figure 11.6 on page 276 of the textbook. Identify your state’s status on same-sex marriage. Explain which sociological concept best supports the changing attitude towards same sex marriage (depicted in Figure 11.5 on page 276 of the textbook).(100 words)

 

 

 

 

 

 

………………Answer Preview………………

DISCUSSION 1-SANDUSKY MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL

Sandusky’s case is considered to be one of the most controversial in the legal history. However, upon his indictment several factors were brought to light as pertaining to his request for retrial. First and foremost the judge did not instruct the jury of the validity of the victim’s testimonies. The victims did not report prompt report of the sexual violations committed against them with some eve taking a decade or more to….

APA

528 words

 

× Lets chat on whatsapp?