Religious ethicists are concerned with addressing issues of moral and political concern
Essay prompt. Religious ethicists are concerned with addressing issues of moral and political concern, especially as these issues arise within or are given justification from religious traditions. Violence that is justified using islamic sources-from (among others) the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, or Osama bin Laden-confronts many religious ethicists. Pick an example discussed by Kelsay. What sorts of religious reasons do the actors in the example you picked use? Then, drawing from Hauerwas, Miller, Stalnaker, or Stout, discuss how you would (or wouldn’t) assess the reasoning given by the actors in the example. Is it possible to engage in cross-religious ethical evaluation? If so, how? If not, why not?
Even you have not read the John Kelsay’s article which is the most important one and related to the prompt. Don’t use any other source you have to follow the prompt step by step I don’t have time we have only 10 hours from now
If you can’t do it just say that so I can find another tutor.
1) Have you discussed all parts of the prompt?
a) Discussed one of the three cases?
b) Discussed which Religious Ethicist they’re using to analyze the case.
c) Identified how they would (or wouldn’t) Evaluate the actors in the case.
2) Does the paper have a clear thesis?
3) Are terms defined?
4) Is the paper the right length?
5) Is the paper free from grammatical & stylistic issues?
Stalnaker Overcoming Our Evil Ch 8-9
Overcoming Our Evil – Chapter 5
Stalnaker Overcoming Our Evil Ch 1, 2, 5
Democracy andf Tradition Ch 9, 10
Democracy andf Tradition Intro, Ch 3, 5 (1)
Democracy andf Tradition Intro, Ch 3, 5
Christian and religious ethics
Hauer was_the_peaceable_kingdom_ch_1_4_2
Miller_friends_and_other_strangers_ch._2
Sample_paper (1) Paper_structure (1) Details
Answer preview to religious ethicists are concerned with addressing issues of moral and political concern
APA
1841 words