Psychology and communication
Annotated Bib and research paper – no PLAGIARISM
Begin this final Critical Thinking Assignment by creating an annotated bibliography, using at least six sources. These sources can be the sources on a particular topic that you have gathered over the course of the past three modules, or on another topic of your choosing.
For each annotated citation, summarize the main theme and scope of the source. Each annotation should include a sentence or two related to each of the following criteria:
Your evaluation of who is responsible for the content of the source or the authority of the author(s)
A summary of the main theme or key elements of the article and its intended audience
An explanation of how the information compares to or contrasts with the other work you have cited; you will summarize the argument or stance of the author in each source and then connect the sources by comparing their similarities and differences, stating your interpretation of the issues
Each annotation should be two paragraphs long, making your total assignment 2-3 pages in length.
Adhere to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA and see the example annotated bibliography.
Next, write a 3-4 page paper, complete with in-text and reference citations, in which you connect the sources from your annotated bibliography. You may reuse some of the writing from your annotated bibliography to complete your paper. In a final paragraph, share what you learned about writing and research during this course overall. What did you learn about yourself as a researcher during this course? Connect your performance in the class to your overall growth as a researcher. How does this work connect with your overall education?
Final Submission:
2-3 Page annotated bibliography paper
3-4 Page summative paper connecting the sources from your annotated bibliography, complete with in-text and reference citations
……………………Answer preview………………….
So brief yet so conclusive. This article reminds readers of what it takes and means to be the perfect qualitative researcher. The author is an experienced professor of psychology and communication and also co-directs the Center for Qualitative research. The article seeks to eliminate the difference between being a good researcher academically and ethically by suggesting that the two are so similar. It also discusses on how researchers should relate with their subject of research in a moral fashion…………………..
APA
1888 words