Analyze and evaluate planning management and models.
Analyze and evaluate planning management and models.
Discuss connections between politics and public policy.
Identify issues surrounding program delivery in government versus proactive solutions (rowing vs. steering).
i believe these are the questions, from what i can see
The events that were described in this case
study sounds to me as if they started off with the planning model of
Rational Planning. I say this due to the fact that all the right parties
were alerted to what needed to be done with goals being said and set to
be put into place for starters. This did help with the main concerns
being priorities and kept to along with formations being followed with
effective organized tactics. They were put into place after the goals
were set and made. As I read this case study and from my understandings
this war was being analyzed and evaluated by senior officers in
Washington who all had different ways and structures they thought would
work best for meeting the goals that had been set into place. This was
one of the Rational models of continuing opinions with the planning
process in order to see what all has currently worked with what was set
to be done and what was not working and needed to be taken out and
improved. But with that being said this is where I could see were the
Rational Planning model some what worked and where the weakness of the
plan begin to splay its role. The thorough communications about the
goals that worked and were not working were not being met let alone
everyone was on different pages with alternative actions that needed to
be done. There were no set connections information being made of all the
shared resources at all.
Answer preview to analyze and evaluate planning management and models.
APA
741 words