Logic and language
Assignment Instructions: Peer Response Instructions
1. Respond to a minimum of two peers. Each peer response post must be a minimum of 75 words and should be posted by the deadline listed in the gradebook.
One of the (2) peer responses may be a response to an instructor\’s post.
2. Peer responses should be substantive, meaning they add something new to the discussion and do not just agree with what was said. This is also a time to ask questions or offer information about the topic.
3. One reference per peer response.
Peer #1
The relationship between Logic and language is crucial, especially in the context of political discourse. Language is not just a method of communication, it shapes how we understand, evaluate, and respond to political issues. This week’s reading on euphemisms in political debate highlights how strategically chosen words can mask harsh realities or reframe issues in a way that influences public opinion. For example, calling civilian casualties “collateral damage” detaches the emotional and ethical weight from the event (Weston, 2020). This use of euphemisms can subtly manipulate how people perceive the morality or urgency of a situation.
When politicians use emotionally charged or vague language, it often bypasses logical thinking and appeals directly to values, fears, or biases. This makes it harder for the public to critically analyze the real implications of a policy or event (Weston, 2020). Therefore, understanding meta cognition, being aware of how we process and respond to such language, can help us resist manipulation and engage in more objective political thinking.
Peer #2
Politicians use euphemisms for various reasons. One reason is to avoid using harsh or negative language that could offend or upset people. Euphemisms can also be used to make something sound more positive or less serious than it actually is. According to a source, euphemisms tend to serve as signals of political-?tribal membership, but also as means to convince ambivalent voters to support one policy or the other. Violating the other political tribe’s euphemisms can even help a candidate get elected President. In addition, euphemisms can be used to hide scandals, disguise the truth, and guide public thoughts when discussing social issues or events.
For example, instead of saying “tax increase,” a politician might say “revenue enhancement.” Instead of saying “fired,” they might say “let go” or “laid off.” Euphemisms can be used to make something sound more appealing or less threatening than it actually is. However, euphemisms can also be misleading and can obscure the true meaning of
In conclusion, politicians use euphemisms for a variety of reasons, including to avoid offending people, to make something sound more positive or less serious than it actually is, and to hide scandals or disguise the truth. However, euphemisms can also be misleading and can obscure the true meaning of what is being said. Jim
Paper Format: APA
Answer preview to Logic and language
APA
300 WORDS
