Leadership styles
Describe examples of Leadership styles, and identify your past leadership style, current leadership style, and your goal leadership style (if they are the same, just explain that). Include your personal approach to delegation and prioritization.
Describe 4-6 types of leadership styles
Identify your personal leadership style: past, current, and goal leadership styles (if they are the same, just explain that). Explain changes you made (or to be made) from one style to the other and the reasons you believe those changes are beneficial.
Describe your personal approach to delegation and prioritization.
References
Minimum of three(3) total references: at least one (1) reference from required course materials and two (2) peer-reviewed references. All references must be no older than five years (unless making a specific point using a seminal piece of information)
Peer-reviewed references include references from professional data bases such as PubMed or CINHAL applicable to population and practice area, along with evidence based clinical practice guidelines. Examples of unacceptable references are Wikipedia, blogs, UpToDate, Epocrates, Medscape, WebMD, insurance recommendations, & secondary clinical databases. For this assignment, you may also reference your organization\\\’s policy. Be sure to cite your resources, and every citation must have a reference. Style
Unless otherwise specified, all written assignments must follow APA 7th edition formatting, citations and references. Review or download the Microsoft Word APA template . Review this annotated student sample paper guide which draws attention to relevant content and formatting in 7th edition APA style. Make sure you cross-reference the APA 7th edition book as well before submitting the assignment.
Number of Pages/Words
Should be 2-4 pages, excluding the title and reference pages.
Guidelines
Instructions
To be successful, complete the following steps in order:
STEP 1. Review the instructional materials and finish learning activities in this module.
STEP 2. Review the grading rubric.
STEP 3. Create a new Word document, write your paper based on the above overview.
STEP 4. Refer to APA book and rubric for correctly formatting the paper.
STEP 5. Save the document with the following format: \\”YourLastname_YourFirstname_Module_2_Writing Assignment\\” (Example: Smith_Jill_Module_2_Writing Assignment.docx)
STEP 6. Submit the document by clicking the link above titled \\”Start Assignment.\\”
Technical Support
Need help using Canvas Assignments? If so, please review the following page: Canvas Resources for Students – Assignments.
Rubric
M2 WA Leadership Styles
M2 WA Leadership Styles
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe examples of leadership styles
10 pts
Proficient
Demonstrates full understanding of leadership in nursing and clearly describes characteristics of various leadership styles. The central purpose is clear and supporting ideas are well-focused. Comprehensively addresses all key elements of the assignment.
8 pts
Advanced Beginner
Demonstrates understanding of leadership styles in nursing with brief or slightly vague details. Mostly addresses all key elements of the assignment.
5 pts
Novice
Demonstrates a basic knowledge of nursing leadership concepts but inconsistencies may be present. The central purpose is identifiable, but not immediate clear. Supporting ideas are not completely focused. Partially addresses key elements of the assignment.
3 pts
Unsuccessful
Demonstrates a limited understanding of nursing leadership concepts. Details are missing or lacking significant depth. The central purpose is not well-defined. Thoughts appear disconnected. Missing 1 or more key elements of the assignment. (0-3pts)
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentify your own leadership style: past, present, and goal
10 pts
Proficient
Demonstrates full, insightful analysis with strong logical reasoning. Effectively applies relevant theories or concepts. Comprehensively addresses all key elements. Engages in meaningful self-reflection, recognizing biases and professional growth.
8 pts
Advanced Beginner
Provides structured analysis with logical reasoning. Applies relevant concepts and connects them to real-world examples and/or concepts. Engages in self-reflection but may not fully explore or consider biases and/or professional growth.
5 pts
Novice
Demonstrates basic analysis and reasoning, though some details may be underdeveloped. Lacks strong connections to real-world situations/concepts. Superficial self-reflection.
3 pts
Unsuccessful
Minimal or missing depth, with weak reasoning and unsupported claims. Concepts are not well applied to practice. Self-reflection is absent or lacks any meaningful insight. (0-3pts)
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe your own approach to delegation and prioritization
10 pts
Proficient
Clearly describes delegation and prioritization approach including integration of leadership style and relevant, credible evidence. Synthesizes and utilizes multiple sources effectively. Sources of evidence are credible, relevant, and not more than 5 years old and scholarly. * Includes required types and number of sources.
8 pts
Advanced Beginner
Describes personal approach to delegation and prioritization with some details and information about leadership styles. Uses credible and relevant sources. Integrates multiple sources effectively, though there may be some inconsistencies. Most sources of evidence are scholarly and published within the last 5 years. * Includes required types and number of sources.
5 pts
Novice
Uses sources but may not fully evaluate credibility, bias, or relevance of sources. Demonstrates some effort to integrate ideas, but synthesis is limited. Some sources of evidence are not scholarly and published more than 5* years ago. Some sources are not the required type or do not meet the required number of sources.
3 pts
Unsuccessful
Uses weak or irrelevant sources with little to no consideration of credibility or relevance. Fails to integrate information from sources or makes unsupported claims. Sources are >5 years old. Sources are not the required type; does not meet the required number of sources. (0-3pts)
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA 7th Edition Formatting & Writing Quality
5 pts
Proficient
Demonstrates near-perfect adherence to APA 7th edition formatting, including correct title page, in-text citations, and references. Writing is clear, polished, and professional, with strong sentence structure, appropriate word usage, and varied sentence flow. Free of spelling, grammar, or typographical errors.
4 pts
Advanced Beginner
Mostly follows APA 7th edition formatting, with minor errors in citations, references, or formatting elements. Writing is clear and professional with minimal awkward phrasing. A few minor grammar, spelling, or typographical errors do not detract from readability.
2 pts
Novice
Attempts APA formatting but has multiple errors in citations, references, or title page. Writing is somewhat clear but contains noticeable awkward phrasing or word choice issues. Several grammar, spelling, or typographical errors affect readability.
1 pts
Unsuccessful
Minimal or incorrect use of APA 7th edition formatting; major errors in citations, references, and title page. Writing lacks clarity, with frequent sentence structure issues, poor word usage, and numerous grammar, spelling, and typographical errors that significantly impact readability. (0-3pts)
5 pts
Total Points: 35
Answer preview to Leadership styles
APA
600 WORDS
