Should public policy change to some way so that unions that win representation rights have a guarantee
Questions from the 12th addition of Labor Relations by John Fossum
To what extent should the NLRB get involved in determining bargaining units? Shouldn’t the vote be in the unit preferred by employees?
Should union organizers have more or less access to employees in organizing campaigns than they do now?
Do employees have an unfair tactical advantage in union organizing situations?
Is the resistance of employees to unionization a new phenomenon or simply a return to the historic relationship that has existed between unions and management in the United States?
Would you expect a stronger anti-union response from an employer in manufacturing or an employer in a service industry?
Should public policy change to some way so that unions that win representation rights have a guarantee that they will be able to negotiate a first contract?
What effect does a lower elasticity of demand have on the wage and employment outcomes for the employer and the union?
How is bargaining power influenced by deregulation and foreign completion? Who is most affected by these changes –labor or management?
How do technological changes affect the relative bargaining power of the parties?
What demands would most likely be advocated by union leaders in obtaining contract ratification?
What are the economic benefits of union membership to employees, and to what extent can these benefits be increased before employees face problems?
What are the tradeoffs among increased wages for union, productivity effects and profitability?
Why union officials are likely to oppose flexible work hours and other innovations work schedules?
What potential problems and benefits are likely with early or flexible retirement programs?
……………………Answer preview…………………
According to Wagner Act, NLRB was to promote a collective bargain as a way to maintain free flow of commerce. The employee sentiment about configuration of bargain is not the primary but it had to balance the needs of firms, labor, workers and public interest.
Unions should have more access to the employees so as to accomplish their aim. This is because the union recruits then and forms their campaign. This will help them to create a better communication n channel than it is today.
Employees are well represented by the committee that is set selected to represent them. They also have a chance to block the employer from manipulating them. Therefore, they are not considered to have unfair tactical advantage……………………………………………..
APA
557 words
Get instant access to the full solution from yourhomeworksolutions by clicking the purchase button below