Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Amendment Rights

Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Amendment Rights

The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects citizens against
>> police officers making unreasonable searches and seizures of personal
>> property. The Fifth and Sixth Amendments guarantee the procedures that
>> the
>> courts and police must use to ensure fair treatment of persons arrested
>> for
>> crimes.
>>
>>
>>
>> Analyze the following cases in preparation for a systematic approach for
>> a
>> synthesis of law and fact.
>>
>>
>>
>> Review each of the follow cases:
>>
>>    – *Katz v. United States*, 389 US 347 (1967) located at
>>
>> http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=9210492700696416594&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
>>    – *Miranda v Arizona* (1966) located at
>>
>> http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=384&invol=436
>>
>>
>>
>> Write an six (each 300 words) pages paper in which you:
>>
>>    1. Prepare a two to three (2-3) page briefing from one of the two
>>    (1-2) cases that you reviewed in which you utilized the following areas
>> of
>>    importance: a) issue presented; b) short answer; c) the facts of the
>> case;
>>    d) a summary of the case; and e) a conclusion of the case outcome.
>>    2. Examine the importance of the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendment of
>>    the U.S. Constitution, and determine which amendment offers the
>> greatest
>>    protection for defendants in a typical U.S. court case. Justify your
>>    position.
>>    3. Explore the overall importance of the Fifth Amendment rights.
>>    Suggest key events from the *Miranda v Arizona* case in which you
>>    believe law enforcement had violated the fundamental nature of one’s
>> Fifth
>>    Amendment right. Justify your response.
>>    4. Examine three (3) instances in which the Fourth Amendment protects
>>    you against unlawful search and seizure. Provide examples of such
>>    occurrences to support your response.
>>    5. Discuss the two prong test articulated by the Court which
>>    determines the actual nature of a reasonable expectation of privacy.
>>    Justify the validity of the test in the courts holding for the Katz v
>>    United States case.
>>    6. Analyze whether or not today’s standards allowing government access
>>    to all electronic technologies through legislation, like the Uniting
>> and
>>    Strengthening America By Providing Appropriate Tools Required To
>> Intercept
>>    and Obstruct Terrorism (U.S.A. P.A.T.R.I.O.T) Act of 2001, have
>> effectively
>>    negated the holding in *Katz v. United States*.
>>    7. Use at least four (4) quality references. *Note:* Wikipedia and
>>    other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.
>>
>>
>>
>> Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
>>
>>    – Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with
>>    one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA
>> or
>>    school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional
>>    instructions. use subtitles in your work.
>>    – Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the