Why is prevention of an attack more important to the private sector than apprehension of the attacker
write 400–600 words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your ideas.
Why is prevention of an attack more important to the private sector than apprehension of the attacker? Provide a rationale based on what you have read and learned this week, and then offer an example in support of your position.
Resources
Catrantzos: Defining Homeland Security section: pages 184-186
Access the following documents:
U.S. Department of Justice. (1995, June 28). Vulnerability assessment of federal facilities. Retrieved from the IT Law Wiki Web site: http://itlaw.wikia.com/wiki/Vulnerability_Assessme…
U.S. Department of the Army. (2001, January 8). FM 3-19.30: Physical security. Retrieved from the Internet Archive Web site: http://archive.org/details/milmanual-fm-3-19.30-ph…
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (2013). Planning & templates: FEMA continuity planning guidance. Retrieved from http://www.fema.gov/about/org/ncp/coop/templates.s…
………………………Answer preview………………………
It is more important for security agencies to prevent the next attack than to apprehend an attacker for a number of reasons. First and obviously so, prevention is better than curing. When apprehending an attacker the damage is already done and there is no much to be done. If it involves people they would be hurt of dead already and there is little that can be done. It is for this basic reason that governments and business………………….
APA
605 words
Get instant access to the full solution from yourhomeworksolutions by clicking the purchase button below
