Explain how the company’s treatment of both the “covert” and “overt” salts applications for jobs compares
Assignment Details: Read Case Study 4-1, “Salting,” in your textbook. Heavrin, C., & Carrell, M. R. (2013). Labor Relations and Collective Bargaining (10th ed.). Pearson Education (US). https://online.vitalsource.com/books/9780133468021
Then, address the following:
Explain how the company’s treatment of both the “covert” and “overt” salts applications for jobs compares to the recommended counter-salting steps for employers.
Would either the “covert” or the “overt” salts in this case satisfy the NLRB ruling that applicants for employment must be genuinely interested in seeking employment before claiming protection under the NLRA?
Does the company’s opposition to becoming a union shop indicate that there was anti-union animus in refusing to consider the “overt” salts for employment?
Your response should be a minimum of 300 words per question. You are required to use APA Style for this assignment and have a standard scholarly paper with a title page and a reference page. You would include a level one heading for each main topic. You would start with an introduction where you share an overview of the case.
You are required to use, at least, two references. All sources used, including the textbook, must be referenced; paraphrased material must have accompanying citations in APA format. As you are paraphrasing what you read in the book, you would have citations in your paragraphs. If citing only one reference in a paragraph, one citation (author(s), year) is enough.
Paper Format: APA
Answer preview to Explain how the company’s treatment of both the “covert” and “overt” salts applications for jobs compares
APA
1196 words
