This week’s lecture focused on moral development and ethical reasoning
Kohlberg’s Three Levels of Morality
This week’s lecture focused on moral development and ethical reasoning. As part of your readings for the week, Kohlberg’s three levels of morality were discussed. How would you have answered Heinz’s dilemma? (See readings for the week for the full dilemma). Which of Kohlberg’s three levels of morality do you feel you are in? Do you feel you are in a different level of morality in different settings (i.e. work vs. personal life?) How has your morality (if it has) progressed from your adolescence?
Your work should be at least 500 words, but mostly draw from your own personal experience. This should be written in first person and give examples from your life. Be sure if you are using information from the readings that you properly cite your readings in this, and in all assignments
| Grading Criteria Assignments | Maximum Points |
| Meets or exceeds established assignment criteria | 40 |
| Demonstrates an understanding of lesson concepts | 20 |
| Clearly present well-reasoned ideas and concepts | 30 |
| Mechanics, punctuation, sentence structure, spelling that affects clarity, and citation of sources as needed | 10 |
| Total | 100 |
………………Answer Preview………………..
Morality Dilemma
Heinz dilemma is a tricky one but this is how I would have answered it. Given that I am able to make only a thousand and the pharmacist has refused to give the drugs which I know that will help my wife get well, I will steal it. I know that it is wrong to steal but if I do not steal then my wife will not get well, for her sake, I will rather steal than watch her die.
After reading Kohlberg’s dilemma I feel that I am in the preconvention thought. In most cases, I will do something because I know…
APA
676 words
Get instant access to the full solution from yourhomeworksolutions by clicking the purchase button below