Home » Downloads » Respond to each persons discussion on Corrections and Ethics 

Respond to each persons discussion on Corrections and Ethics 

Respond to each persons discussion on Corrections and Ethics

Respond to each persons discussion on Corrections and Ethics using between 50-75 words.
1.) Morally punishment is a way to balance out acts of society. If something is not ethically correct, it can cause harm not only to that person but to society as well. For example, imprisonment gets used to taking away the criminal’s freedom as a debt to the community for the crimes they committed. Deterrence plays the role of prevention in captivity. It is getting used to trying to prevent other crimes from happening like the one that has already happened.An example of this is a criminal getting charged with murder getting sentenced in jail for life. You take away someone’s breath, so now, your life as a free citizen is taken. Rehabilitation gets used to help criminals receive treatment in more than one way. Recovery is the role of rehabilitation. It can be in the form of rehab for drug programs, alcohol programs, and even in the form of rehabilitating a person to be a stand-up citizen. It also can include educational programs like the G.E.D programs and in some prison facilities college classes.

2.)  Punishment often involves pain or deprivation that people wish to avoid, it’s the intentional imposition by the state that requires justification. The difficulties of justification cannot be avoided by the view that punishment is an inevitable in a system of criminal law. If criminal law is designed to include punishment, the question remains whether society should have a system of mandatory rules enforced by penalties. In society threatened punishments are not always inflicted on people who have committed crimes. The police or prosecutor may decide not to proceed, a jury may acquit in the face of unmistakable evidence of guilt, or a judge may decide after conviction not to impose punishment. A judge with authority to make such a decision must determine if punishment is appropriate; even if punishment is legally required to be imposed, the counter reasons may be so powerful that the court will not do so. If actual punishment never or very rarely followed threatened punishment, then the threat of punishment would lose significance. Punishment in some cases are a practical necessity for any system in which threats of punishment are taken seriously and the justification of punishment is inseparable from the justification of threats of punishment.

Answer preview to respond to each persons discussion on Corrections and Ethics

Respond to each persons discussion on Corrections and Ethics 

APA

155 words

Get instant access to the full solution from yourhomeworksolutions by clicking the purchase button below

× Lets chat on whatsapp?