Ordinarily, opponents of censorship direct their attention against the government patrolling political speech

Ordinarily, opponents of censorship direct their attention against the government patrolling political speech

Ordinarily, opponents of censorship direct their attention against the government patrolling political speech through its formidable legal apparatus. But, nowadays, there may be more to fear from individuals and informal groups patrolling unpopular opinions and punishing them without reliance on the police power of the state. What about this? A CEO or chairman of the board of a restaurant chain remarks in an interview that he/she thinks that gay marriage ought not be legal. Would it be morally permissible – not legally, which would be a different issue entirely – to organize a national boycott against that company? Or to bring pressure on the corporation to fire the CEO in favor of some person with ideas more congenial to protestors? What is there to be said on either side of this issue?

Minimum 600 words

…………………Answer preview…………………..

We share opinions on several issues that affect society today than before because of progressive human rights protection and constitutional liberties guaranteed in the Bill of Rights in the United States Constitution and the Universal Declaration of human rights as defined by the UN’s Charter on Human Rights. Censorship…………………

APA

650 words

Get instant access to the full solution from yourhomeworksolutions by clicking the purchase button below