Create an argument that conforms to one of the valid argument forms discussed in section 1.2 of the textbook
Assignment: 1-1 Journal: Common Valid and Invalid Argument Forms
Create an argument that conforms to one of the valid argument forms discussed in section 1.2 of the textbook: modus ponens, modus tollens, hypothetical syllogism, disjunctive syllogism, or constructive dilemma. This means you will choose one of the valid argument forms and supply an argument with content that fits that form. Use capital letters to supply a substitution instance of your argument to demonstrate that the correct form was used. Last, explain whether your argument is sound.
Now, create an argument that conforms to one of the invalid argument forms discussed in Section 1.3 of the textbook: affirming the consequent or denying the antecedent. Provide a counter-example to one of these arguments and explain why it is a counter-example. Remember a counter-example proves invalidity by providing an instance of the form with true premises and a false conclusion as such, your counter-example must do three things: 1.
It must fit the logical form of one of the invalid arguments, 2. It must have all true premises,
and 3. It must have a false conclusion.
1-1-Journal -Common-Valid-and-Invalid-Argument-Forms-PHL-214-H1106-Formal-Logic-21EW1
Answer preview to create an argument that conforms to one of the valid argument forms discussed in section 1.2 of the textbook
APA
527 words