An academic argument starts with a well-defined stance on a chosen topic that is then developed
An academic argument starts with a well-defined stance on a chosen topic that is then developed and supported through evidence found in previous research (Bridges et al., 2020). It is important to hold the ability to defend an argument because it proves the researcher is knowledgeable on the topic and that the research is needed (Bridges et al., 2020). A well-rounded argument utilizes information from several sources to support the position the researcher is taking on a particular topic; by providing multiple sources to back up the claims of the researcher (Bridges et al., 2020). An argument involves the researcher taking information from previous research and making connections among multiple resources to support the main point made; the use of previous research makes the argument stronger when there are several articles to support the claims made (Bridges et al., 2020). This process requires researchers to have strong comprehension skills so that they are able to correctly understand the literature reviewed and use it appropriately throughout their research project (Bridges et al., 2020). The process of argumentation leads to scholarly conversation because other researchers have the opportunity to prove the claim to be true, or false, or simply add to what is already stated. This process can resemble an endless cycle because data can hold several interpretations that result in different outcomes.
Bridges, S., Banaszewski, C., Kelly, S., Wozniak, R., & Maul, J. (2020). Argumentations. GCU doctoral research: The literature landscape. Retrieved March 24, 2023, from https://lc.gcumedia.com/res820/gcu-doctoral-resear…
Answer preview to An academic argument starts with a well-defined stance on a chosen topic that is then developed
APA
213 words
