Home » Downloads » Agile project management (APM) in comparison to traditional methodologies.

Agile project management (APM) in comparison to traditional methodologies.

Agile project management (APM) in comparison to traditional methodologies.

Each reply must be a minimum of 200 words and include at least 2 scholarly resources. Acceptable sources include the textbook, the Bible, outside scholarly articles, etc.

Substantive replies, in contrast to perfunctory replies, add value to the discussion, enhance learning, and contain references to any new concepts or ideas presented.

The following suggestions will aid you in successfully composing substantive responses:

•       Compare/contrast the findings of others with your research.

•       Compare how the findings of others relate/add to the concepts learned in the required readings.

•       Share additional knowledge regarding the key topic that relates to the thread.

Kristin Barton

RE: Agile Project Management

Attachment

COLLAPSE

Discussion Board 1 – Agile Project Management            

 

This paper discusses agile project management (APM) in comparison to traditional methodologies. APM was originally implemented in software development, but has since been implemented in a variety of business industries and departments. APM is important for businesses who face continuous change in the production of their products. While traditional approaches are logical and placed within a linear sequence, APM offers an improved and efficient method while pursuing stakeholder value.Key Concept ExplanationAPM is an alternative strategic business approach that takes a large project and breaks it into smaller steps or tasks. Each step or task is considered an iteration or milestone within the project life cycle. The emphasis of APM is placed on customer satisfaction, quickly responding and adapting to changes presented by the customer or the environment and to be addressed during the next iteration. APM begins with a tentative plan and then, during the execution of the task, modifications are made and the actual planning is performed. As a result, APM is a nonlinear approach that places more emphasis on flexible collaboration. This topic was chosen because of my personal interest in project management approaches that require flexibility due to environmental pressures as well as academic curiosity.Comparison            The information provided from the module in comparison to the research completed was informative. The module provided the basic introduction regarding APM, which was adequate for a student who is unfamiliar with the approach. The module compared to the research provided a comparison of APM to a traditional waterfall approach. This comparison is frequently examined and research. For example, Turginbayeva et al. (2020) demonstrated how traditional methods first require a master plan and then change management must monitor and minimize any negative effects to the project changes, while APM is more efficient in its deployment of plans that are easily modified throughout the process.The concept of APM as well as traditional project management approaches were illuminated by the added details throughout the research. Thesing et al. (2021) provided further detail on the advantages and disadvantages of choosing APM over traditional methods while Krehbiel and Miller (2018) further explored the benefits of APM within quality management. Both the module and the research articles, especially the article by Petrillo et al. (2018), expressed that APM offers an array of practices that can be applied in part or in whole to improve weak areas found within traditional project management approaches. The completed research provided further exploration of APM in industries and departments not specific to software development.Article Summary            The article for this discussion is titled “Traditional vs Agile Project Management in the Service Sector” and was chosen because of an interest in not only a flexible management approach but also because of an interest in applying APM to a service area as opposed to software development within the information technology sector. Through a comparative analysis, the article examined APM in contrast to three traditional methodologies (PMI, IPMA, and PRINCE2). While a specific entity or industry within the service sector was never officially identified, the description and areas that would benefit from APM were discussed. These areas or characteristics included the variability, intangibility, and the immediate consumption. These features of the service sector were examined throughout the paper through the lenses of both APM and traditional approaches. The comparison was examined throughout the following eight areas of project management: schedule, cost, organization and communication, risk and change management, quality, procurement, and stakeholder. The generalized outcome for implementing certain elements and values of APM within the service sector resulted in the shortening of a planning period, reduced hesitation and reluctancy toward change, and encouraged cooperation from stakeholders (Grebi?, 2019). Ares of the service industry benefitting from APM included breaking large service tasks into smaller segments, reflection periods before or following a task, visualization of the workflow and user-stories, easier prioritization of tasks, ongoing teamwork, and more interaction with clients or consumers. According to this article, while traditional project management approaches were utilized more often in the service sector, APM offered an approach that was complementary and improved the efficiency of processes and tasks.Biblical Integration

When viewing APM from a biblical worldview, there are two different perspectives. First, the following verse comes to mind: “the heart of man plans his ways, but the Lord establishes his steps” (Proverbs 16:9, English Standard Version). In this verse, men can set up an initial plan just as a project manager sets up their tentative plan. However, as the tasks proceed and feedback is received, the plans are adjusted and modified. While the project manager and team members work together to meet the goals of the project, God helps his people by gently guiding them throughout life to achieve a certain goal or, ultimately, live eternally with Him.

From a second viewpoint, the Christian project manager is positioned to responsibly implement procedures that are both effective and efficient. In this manner, they are implementing a lifestyle of diligence (Proverbs 21:5, ESV). The project manager is also demonstrating wisdom and making the best use of their time (Ephesians 5:15-16, ESV). Both of these qualities not only improve the company’s outcomes, but also demonstrate conscientious, Christian living.

 

Application

As a fan of the tv series, Hotel Impossible, the use of APM in this area of the service industry fits well. To begin, this segment of the service sector must remain highly flexible, meeting guest needs, responding to environment concerns, achieving safety and profitability goals, and staying competitive with surrounding hotels. One bad review on social media could cause the entire company to sink into bankruptcy. Because changes happen quickly in the hotel industry, planning for tasks becomes a challenge (Turginbayeva et al., 2020). For example, communicating between housekeeping, maintenance, and the front desk about dirty or damaged rooms can easily turn into a bottleneck that negatively impacts the consumer. APM addresses this bottle neck by changing the linear flow of process implementing instead stand-up meetings at the beginning of each day. These meetings provide opportunity for managers to reflect on the prior days’ successes and failure, to discuss priorities for specific departments, to communicate about incoming guests’ needs, and to set the expectations for the day. It also provides the opportunity for team members to express needs or become aware of other departments’ weaknesses and potentially assist in meeting their needs. This one example demonstrates how APM requires teamwork and collaboration, improves communication, and achieves consumer satisfaction faster than a traditional method.

 

Annotated Bibliography

Grebi?, B. (2019). Traditional vs agile project management in the service sector. EuropeanProject Management Journal, 9(2), 55-63.http://liberty.summon.serialssolutions.com/#!/search?bookMark=eNqdzr0KwjAYheEgFaw_u2NuoDGpsTaDg4jiIgh2D7F-akqblCQUvHupODg7vWc58IxRZKwBhOaMEpbzfLWAtqlISpkggqQkG6A4XWU04SJj0c8eoZn3-ko55WvBcxGjTeHUTQdtjapx5_H2oWvAZ2crKAM-KaMe0IAJWBscnoAv4Dpd9i2DdVM0vKvaw-zbCaKHfbE7JqWz3ju4y9bpRrmXZFR-pLKXyl4qhUxltvzj8gYq-UmRThe author of this article compared APM to traditional methodologies, specifically PMI, IMPA, and PRINCE2, within the service industry. Following a review of each approach, the author identified the values, principles, and benefits of APM. The author then completed a comparative analysis of APM and traditional methodologies within eight categories of project management. These eight areas included schedule, cost, organization and communication, risk and change management, quality, procurement, and stakeholder. The end result was that certain projects belonging to the service industry would benefit from APM, both in part and as a whole. Having superior knowledge of both traditional methods and APM is a requirement however.

 

 

Krehbiel, T. & Miller, D. (2018). Should agile be part of your quality management system?Journal of International Technology and Information Management, 27(1), 2-28. http://liberty.summon.serialssolutions.com/#!/search?bookMark=eNotjstqwzAUREVJoXn0HwRdC_S27qqE0BektCXZZBUk6ypNcOTWshf5-xqa1QwDZ2ZmZJLbjDdkKkALZm0Fk9EbrZgBK-_IrJQT51Y6bqak2ny3QxPp8nBskAakn77raZvorh06-jX45thf6LvP_oBnzD3dXEqP58cFuU2-KXh_1TnZPj9tV69s_fHytlqumXDGMDBKQOVFLV1wJjpfI0RIOnHOdZAClNUcVETlkrJ1CFEaA-BrOyYKnZqTh__an679HbD0-9P4K4-LeymkHmHOjfoDk2FCywThis research article examined how APM can be implemented within a quality management system inside an information technology sector. The authors began their research by discussing the history and purpose of APM. They then discussed traditional approaches, specifically the Deming management theory. This led into a survey and comparison of APM to lean and six sigma process methods. Within the parameters of quality management systems, the authors expressed that APM should not stand alone, but should be integrated with either lean or six sigma to form a hybrid approach. The authors also identified that with the growing attraction of APM and its implementation, that understanding APM is imperative even if it is not directly used by the organization.

 

 

Petrillo, A., Di Bona, G., Forcina, A., & Silvestri, A. (2018). Building excellence through theagile reengineering performance model (arpm): A strategic business model for organizations. Business Process Management Journal, 24(1), 128-157. http://liberty.summon.serialssolutions.com/#!/search?bookMark=eNotkD1PwzAURS1UJNrCD2DLCIPBz3ZsZ0wryocSEVXdrTh5SYPcBDlUgn9PIpjOHe69w1mRRT_0SMgtsAcAZh43Rf5GmaCcgaKMabggS9CxoRJALaYslaAaYnlFVuP4wdi04nJJss2583XXtxF-V-g99hVGX8cwnNvjRIzStvMY7RH7tusRw1wtMDRDOJVzNx9q9NFdui_y-2ty2ZR-xJt_rslh93TYvtDs_fl1m2a0AmU0NRJ5IxJ0SriygVLG2tVax0oZUzrQvAahOFRJk1TaxU6hUg4TzjjDGoVYE_i7rcIwjgEb-xm6Uxl-LDA727CzDcuEnW3Y2Yb4BRxqU_QDue to an everchanging environment, the authors of this article examined APM and designed a business model for companies striving to develop and innovative culture. The researchers begin by discussing the importance of innovation as well as flexibility given the backdrop of uncertain global economies. With a brief acknowledgement of how traditional project management approaches fall short, the authors explored relevant literature to demonstrate the benefits of APM in conjunction with business project reengineering (BPR).  The researchers designed a model conjoining APM with BPR and implemented in a water bottling plant. Through this case study, the authors determined the best model to implement APM with BPR for optimizing production lines.

 

Thesing, T., Feldmann, C., & Burchardt, M. (2021). Agile versus waterfall project management:decision model for selecting the appropriate approach to a project. Procedia Computer Science, 181(1), 746-756. http://liberty.summon.serialssolutions.com/#!/search?bookMark=eNp9kE1LAzEQhoNUsNb-Ai_5A10zyW43ETyU-gkWBRWPIZudbVO2m5KsBf-9qVXw5FxmDvO-PDynZND5Dgk5B5YBg-nFOtsGb2PGGYeMQcZ5eUSGIMtywgqmBn_uEzKOcc3SCCkVlEOymS1di3SHIX5E-m56DI1pW_oc_BptTxemM0vcYNdf0mu0Ljrf0YWvsaWND_QF2_TluiXtV0hn20SyDS61HG5jV7T31PzWnZHj1B5x_LNH5O325nV-P3l8unuYzx4nFkRCtaJApYwAqBqjoCihzPMchVK8wgqEqrkpsKkgl1NprWkqw5DnUqLgSvJajIg49NrgYwzY6ES1MeFTA9N7aXqtv6XpvTTNQCdpKXV1SGFC2zkMOlqHncXahQSva-_-zX8Bptx5SAThe authors of this article examined the benefits and constraints of both APM and traditional methodologies. Following a review of these two approaches as well as a hybrid approach, the authors established a decision model to be utilized in determining which approach is best for a predetermined project. The decision model was determined through interviews of managers across a number of firms of all sizes. Advantages and disadvantages of the approaches were determined from a set of predetermined categories. The outcome was a decision model to help project managers choose the best approach, including a hybrid. The outcome of the research also provided insight into the perceived differences of APM when compared to traditional project management approaches.

 

Turginbayeva, A., Nurseitova, G., Zhakupbekova, G., Doszhanov, K., & Konysbay, A. (2020).Ability to use flexible project management in the hotel business. E3S of Web Conferences, 159(1), 1-8. http://liberty.summon.serialssolutions.com/#!/search?bookMark=eNpNkMtOwzAURC1UJErpH7DwD4Rev5J4R6noQyqCBV1bjnNdXKUxioNE_55CK9TVjGZxRjq3ZNDGFgm5Z_DAQLEJiuRi6yccODClQQLoKzLkPC8yxiUfXPQbMk5pBwCMq1KCHJLHaRWa0B9oH-kmIZ03-B2qBulbF3foevpiW7vFPbY9DS3tP5AuY48NffpKocWU7si1t03C8TlHZDN_fp8ts_XrYjWbrjPHSg6ZsmCF14UoNFNC6qJS6K3CSmvJbQm-VlKUDoRksoRKutzmOteF1OC9516MyOrEraPdmc8u7G13MNEG8zfEbmts1wfXoNHgaq4F85V1Uh__S425EshrWTgL9ZElTyzXxZQ69P88BuZXqjlLNZdSxQ_j82uLThis article begins with a literature review of traditional project management methods for the tourism industry as well as the importance of the tourism industry on the global economy. The authors then examined why hotel projects often fail and pinpoint weaknesses of traditional methodologies, such as the resistance to change. The article discussed the values of APM and team roles. Before concluding the paper, the authors provided a visual comparison of APM to traditional methods. The conclusion emphasized the ease of utilizing APM as well as the benefits of establishing an innovative and flexible culture that is receptive to continual change for the benefit of all stakeholders.

 

Answer preview to agile project management (APM) in comparison to traditional methodologies.  Agile project management (APM) in comparison to traditional methodologies.

APA

340 words

Get instant access to the full solution from yourhomeworksolutions by clicking the purchase button below

× Lets chat on whatsapp?