Why does Blackburn think that *how*/*who* caused a death is not always the most ethically relevant factor
Question #1
Why does Blackburn think that *how*/*who* caused a death is not always the most ethically relevant factor to consider?How does his example of the two men who both tried to kill a third (who was crossing the desert) help to illustrate his point?
Question #2
Consider the idea of the ‘Vice of Abstraction,’ do you think this truly represents a form of poor reasoning?Is it really a *vice*, that is an ethically bad habit or behavior?Finally, can you think of examples to help illustrate your viewpoint?
Answer preview to causation and the vice of abstraction
APA
453 words
