Home » Downloads » AARP, AHIP, Coalition for Health Services Research, Emergency Nurses Association, Pharma

AARP, AHIP, Coalition for Health Services Research, Emergency Nurses Association, Pharma

AARP, AHIP, Coalition for Health Services Research, Emergency Nurses Association, Pharma

  1. Select an interest group (AARP, AHIP, Coalition for Health Services Research, Emergency Nurses Association, Pharma)
  2. Discuss how they are pushing their agenda (i.e., mechanisms used to influence policy makers), key obstacles, and spending (consult the Center for Responsible Politics, www.opensecrets.org)
  3. Investigate the interest group’s website and review their position statements, testimony, and consult media reports to obtain more information on the group’s lobbying efforts.

Submission Requirements:

  • Presentation is original work and logically organized. Followed current APA format including citation of references.
  • PowerPoint presentation with 5-8 slides were clear and easy to read. Speaker notes expanded upon and clarified content on the slides.
  • Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.
  • Journal articles and books should be referenced according to current APA style.
  • Attention: Complete and submit the assignment by 11:59 PM ET Friday.
  • Late work policies, expectations regarding proper citations, acceptable means of responding to peer feedback, and other expectations are at the discretion of the instructor.
  • You can expect feedback from the instructor within 48 to 72 hours from the Friday due date.

Grading Rubric

Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

Presentation Rubric     
CriteriaRatingsPoints   
Identification of Main Issues/ProblemsDistinguished – 4 points
Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.
Excellent – 3 points
Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems.
Fair – 2 points
Identifies and demonstrate an acceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.
Poor – 1 point
Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.
4 points
Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/ProblemsDistinguished – 4 points
Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.
Excellent – 3 points
Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.
Fair – 2 points
Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.
Poor – 1 point
Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.
4 points
Demonstrates a Conceptual UnderstandingDistinguished – 4 points
Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.
Excellent – 3 points
Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.
Fair – 2 points
Provides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.
Poor – 1 point
Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.
4 points
Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/LiteratureDistinguished – 4 points
Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.
Excellent – 3 points
Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.
Fair – 2 points
Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.
Poor – 1 point
Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing.
4 points
Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting GuidelinesIncludes Speaker\\\’s Notes and the assigned Number of SlidesDistinguished – 4 points
Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.
Excellent – 3 points
Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.
Fair – 2 points
Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.
Poor – 1 point
Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.
4 points
Total Points20    
   
Presentation Rubric  
CriteriaRatingsPts
Identification of Main Issues/Problems4 ptsDistinguishedIdentify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.3 ptsExcellentIdentifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems.2 ptsFairIdentifies and demonstrate an an acceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.1 ptsPoorIdentifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems./ 4 pts
Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Probelms4 ptsDistinguishedPresents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.3 ptsExcellentPresents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.2 ptsFairPresents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.1 ptsPoorPresents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems./ 4 pts
Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding4 ptsDistinguishedProvides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.3 ptsExcellentProvides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.2 ptsFairProvides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.1 ptsPoorProvides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding./ 4 pts
Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature4 ptsDistinguishedEffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.3 ptsExcellentEffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.2 ptsFairIneffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.1 ptsPoorIneffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing./ 4 pts
Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelinesview longer description4 ptsFull MarksDemonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.3 ptsExcellentDemonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.2 ptsFairDemonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.1 ptsPoorDemonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention./ 4 pts
Total Points: 0  

Choose a submission type

Requirements: 5-8 slides

Answer preview to AARP, AHIP, Coalition for Health Services Research, Emergency Nurses Association, Pharma

AHIP

APA

7PPT

Place order

× Lets chat on whatsapp?