The Common Rule enforces the principles proposed by the Belmont Report in trials that are international and multicentered.
Choose the first question from the three. write 7 pages without references. there are two attached, one is the questions and another one is instructor’s book chapter.
7 PAGES WITHOUT REFERENCES
NOTE: expertise writers only please.
Assessment of essays: Comprehension of concepts and subject matter:
Demonstrates comprehension (max 25 points, 25% grade)
Exemplary = all issues in the question are addressed and the most significant are identified.
Proficient = among all issues that could be raised in this topic, the author identifies at least one significant issue and explains its importance.
Developing = the author correctly identifies significant issues in the topic but fails to explain why they are significant.
Emerging = the author either does not identify any issues of significance or presents them wrongly or as insignificant.
Demonstrates intentional reasoning: (25 points possible)
Exemplary: author tries to characterize a wide range of traditional reasoning and captures it successfully.
Proficient: the author successfully characterizes partial components of a traditional intent/reasoning. There is an effort to characterize the intent or reasoning and explains it somewhat correctly.
Developing: the author attempts to characterize some portion of the texts reasoning and correctly captures a few elements while failing to capture more elements wrong.
Emerging: the author either does not attempt to characterize a text’s intentional reasoning or characterizes this reasoning in incorrect ways (or ignores it altogether).
Writing Mechanics: Writes clearly: (25 points possible)
Exemplary: an exceptionally clear and effective writing style enables points to come through powerfully but also with nuance and precision.
Proficient: style of writing is generally strong, main points are clear and well expressed.
Developing: Main points are discernable but obscured by poor style. Paper is weak as to punctuation, grammar or word choice.
Emerging: writing is unclear. Main points do not come through. Many mechanical errors are present.
Uses Resources Appropriately: (25 points possible)
Exemplary: paper goes beyond what is required and uses a number of outstanding sources. (this means more than the text and my bibliography)
Proficient: Paper uses appropriate sources and employs them to good effect.
Developing: paper has some appropriate sources but it misses some obvious ones.
Emerging: Paper lacks significant number of appropriate sources.
1.Critique how well the Common Rule enforces the principles proposed by the Belmont Report in trials that are international and multicentered. Does Belmont agree with Helsinki or CIOMS2-Vaccines are intended to protect against an infectious agent (virus or bacterium). However, emerging viruses challenge vaccine testing claims with exceptions because of the timing of the epidemic and its unexpected – unanticipated emergence. Evaluate how vaccines can be studied in the midst of an epidemic e.g. Ebola.
3-.Autonomy is embodied in the process of informed consent but autonomy is not the only principle of ethical evaluation of human subject-research. In addition there is the principle of justice and beneficence. Evaluate how these principles are balanced in international trials for a) a new influenza vaccine or malaria vaccine; b) diagnosis and treatment of cervical cancer (all cervical cancer is caused by human papilloma virus, HPV).
Student: I like to work on the first one, but if you would like to choose another one is about u?
Attached is the instructor book chapter.
Answer preview to the Common Rule enforces the principles proposed by the Belmont Report in trials that are international and multicentered.
APA
2390 words