Federal court
Federal court: Someone answered this. (Sheila Johnson
Give your opinion 150 words about what they wrote.
Because both of the parties are residents in the state of Massachusetts, and the accident occurred in Massachusetts, but the amount is $80,000, in should be heard in Massachusetts’ general court.
The fact that there is diversity of citizenship, and the dollar amount is over $75,000, the case should be heard in federal court.
The divorce would be heard in Superior Court in the state of California in the district that they reside in.
George should consider the state’s laws regarding the disagreement. The federal court will have to follow state laws regarding the case. He should also consider the fact that the defendant also has the right to take the case to federal court.
And this girl answered this (Samantha Melvin)
Give your opinion 150 words about what they wrote.
The case of Martha vs. Susan would be heard in state court because it happened within the state.
The case of Sam vs. Jill would be heard in a federal court because they handle cases between multiple states.
The case of Rhonda vs. David would be heard in state court because they handle matters of marriage and divorce.
The case of George vs. Harold some factors that could consider when deciding which court to bring his case to would be the fact that the federal court is through congress directly. And the state laws decide the state courts.
I got the information from uscourts.gov
…………………………Answer preview……………………
The diversity of citizen is not used as a factor to determine whether a case should be heard by a state or federal court. Federal courts usually hear cases that involve conflicts that occur between citizens of interstates. For this reason, since both parties come from Massachusetts, the case will only be heard by a local court in Massachusetts. Secondly, divorce cases cannot be heard by Superior courts within the state……………………….
APA
312 words
