Explain how the company’s treatment of both the “covert” and “overt” salts applications for jobs compares.
Assignment Details: Read Case Study 4-1, “Salting,” in your textbook. Then, address the following:
1. Explain how the company’s treatment of both the “covert” and “overt” salts applications for jobs compares to the
recommended counter-salting steps for employers.
2. Would either the “covert” or the “overt” salts in this case satisfy the NLRB ruling that applicants for employment must
be genuinely interested in seeking employment before claiming protection under the NLRA?
3. Does the company’s opposition to becoming a union shop indicate that there was anti-union animus in refusing to
consider the “overt” salts for employment?
Your response should be a minimum of 300 words per question. All sources used, including the textbook, must be
referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying citations in APA format.
You should use at least two references. Must use your textbook as o reference
Heavrin, C., & Carrell, M. R. (2013). Labor Relations and Collective Bargaining (10th ed.). Pearson Education (US). https://online.vitalsource.com/books/9780133468021
Paper Format: APA
Answer preview to Explain how the company’s treatment of both the “covert” and “overt” salts applications for jobs compares.
APA
1021 words
