The stakeholders in the Cook et al. (2014) study included the senior residents living in these various low-income multi-unit housing facilities
The stakeholders in the Cook et al. (2014) study included the senior residents living in these various low-income multi-unit housing facilities, public health practitioners, housing facility administrators, national and local policymakers, local community health agencies, and tobacco control organizations. As stated in the article, some of these stakeholders included the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the American Lung Association, the Florida Department of Health in Broward County, and the Nova Southeastern University Master of Public Health Program, among others.
After parsing through the literature review in the study, I do think the authors did a good job of framing a policy change. The authors met the criteria that Mason et al. (2021) laid out for effectively framing a policy change including providing the necessary background, establishing the context for the policy change, and identifying gaps the proposed policy aims to fill. They provided a detailed explanation of the existing problem of secondhand smoke exposure in low-income multi-unit housing facilities, the potential benefits of the policy change to create smoke-free policies at these facilities, and an evidence-based argument for why this change is necessary and effective.
A successful policy change like this can indeed have implications at other locations and facilities. If the study demonstrates the significant positive outcomes that the authors predicted, it may serve as a model for similar policy changes in other multi-unit housing establishments, especially those with vulnerable populations such as seniors.
As for the next steps in this program of research and policy, researchers might look into the long-term impacts of the policy change, including effects on health outcomes and quality of life for the seniors living in these multi-unit housing complexes. Subsequent studies could also include a comparative analysis with similar establishments that have yet to incorporate such regulations. The results could potentially serve as a catalyst for advocating broader policy shifts at local, state, or even federal levels.
References
Cook, N. J., Hollar, L., Chavez, S., Quinn, D. L., Phillips, T., DeLucca, M., & Corrales, L. (2014). Support for smoke-free multi-unit housing policies among racially and ethnically diverse, low-income seniors in South Florida. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 29(4), 405–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10823-014-9247-4
Mason, D. J., Perez, A., McLemore, M. R., & Dickson, E. L. (2021). Policy and politics in nursing and health care. Saunders.
Paper Format: APA
Answer preview to The stakeholders in the Cook et al. (2014) study included the senior residents living in these various low-income multi-unit housing facilities
APA
359 words
