L.R. is a 28-year-old female patient who was evaluated at the clinic because she presented thin and white vaginal discharged
Cases
L.R. is a 28-year-old female patient who was evaluated at the clinic because she presented thin and white vaginal discharged which was increased after sexual intercourse.
The vaginal discharge has a pH of 5.2, positive KOH test and clue cells (more than 40% of epithelial cells) on microscopic examination.
O.R. is a 42-year-old female patient that was evaluated by you at the office today. After your evaluation you concluded that she has Toxic Shock Syndrome.
Make a list of minimum 5 Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI’s) with:
Questions for the case
List your Primary diagnosis with ICD 10 number.
Discuss three differential diagnoses for AUB with ICD 10 numbers for each.
Discuss patient education.
Develop the management plan (pharmacological and nonpharmacological).
Discuss and described the pathophysiology and symptomology/clinical manifestations of TSS.
Discuss three differential diagnoses for AUB with ICD 10 numbers for each.
Discuss patient education.
Develop the management plan (pharmacological and nonpharmacological).
Discuss the causative organism for each one.
Discuss and described the pathophysiology and symptomology/clinical manifestations of each.
Discuss patient education.
Develop the management plan (pharmacological and nonpharmacological).
Once you received your case number; answer the specific question on the table above. Then, continue to discuss the 3 topics listed below for your case:
- An effective health assessment incorporates not only physiological parameters; please suggest other parameters that should be considered and included on health assessments to reach maximal health potential on individuals.
- Name the different family developmental stages and give examples of each one.
- Describe family structure and function and the relationship with health care.
Submission Instructions:
- Your instructor will assign you your case number and you will post on the case number you have been assigned.
- You will reply to the other two case studies (One of each).
- Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.
- You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per response.)
- All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.
Grading Rubric
Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.
Discussion Rubric
CriteriaRatingsPoints
Identification of Main Issues, Problems, and Concepts
Distinguished – 5 pointsIdentify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues, problems, and concepts.
Excellent – 4 pointsIdentifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.
Fair – 2 pointsIdentifies and demonstrate an acceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.
Poor – 1 pointIdentifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.
5 points
Use of Citations, Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines
Distinguished – 3 pointsEffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing. High level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.
Excellent – 2 pointsEffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. Moderate level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.
Fair – 1 pointIneffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.
Poor – 0 pointsIneffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.
3 points
Response to Posts of Peers
Distinguished – 2 pointsStudent constructively responded to two other posts and either extended, expanded or provided a rebuttal to each.
Total Points
only case 2 and just answer the question there
10 mins ago
O.R. is a 42-year-old female patient that was evaluated by you at the office today. After your evaluation you concluded that she has Toxic Shock Syndrome.
Discuss and described the pathophysiology and symptomology/clinical manifestations of TSS.
Discuss three differential diagnoses for AUB with ICD 10 numbers for each.
Discuss patient education.
Develop the management plan (pharmacological and nonpharmacological)
An effective health assessment incorporates not only physiological parameters; please suggest other parameters that should be considered and included on health assessments to reach maximal health potential on individuals.
Name the different family developmental stages and give examples of each one.
Describe family structure and function and the relationship with health care.
Submission Instructions:
Your instructor will assign you your case number and you will post on the case number you have been assigned.
You will reply to the other two case studies (One of each).
Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.
You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per response.)
All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.
Answer preview to L.R. is a 28-year-old female patient who was evaluated at the clinic because she presented thin and white vaginal discharged
APA
983 words