Home » Downloads » The intelligence quadrangle entails the four main areas which include actions that need to be taken in producing knowledge

The intelligence quadrangle entails the four main areas which include actions that need to be taken in producing knowledge

The intelligence quadrangle entails the four main areas which include actions that need to be taken in producing knowledge

Isra

The intelligence quadrangle entails the four main areas which include actions that need to be taken in producing knowledge, reports, and briefing that are made in producing knowledge, organizations that are dealing with the knowledge, and the body of knowledge that is deals with. The intelligence quadrangle entails what agencies need to consider in their daily activities and they can be extended to gathering information (i.e., information about illegal trafficking activities, abandoned property, suspicious vehicles, and false identification) and transforming information into intelligence (could be through GIS – Geographical Informational systems), hardening targets, and enhancing training and awareness of Weapons of mass destructions. Intelligence agencies have a crucial role to play within a country’s critical infrastructure, especially in threat assessments (Michael, 2021). Intelligence agencies can also spot weaknesses in security systems, possibly providing Business Intelligence solutions that may be required to solve problems (Agaga, 2018). For instance, the Department of Homeland security gathers information about the vulnerability of critical infrastructure concerning any kind of attack whether on soft or hard targets; this information is presented to bodies such as FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) and NIMS (National Incident Management System) to provide protection/prevention and mitigation interventions for counterintelligence (Hayes & Cappa, 2018).

Prunckun (2019) says that just like a human body consists of several parts that have different operations counterintelligence anatomy is composed of counterespionage and counterintelligence. Counterintelligence is the segment that is concerned with detection and deterrence; this is the primary security function that entails many secrets on how security is used in defensive areas. On the other hand, counterespionage encompasses deceptions, detection, and neutralization for the intelligence activities’ effectiveness. Counterespionage is on the offensive security side it can include forms of spying and the use of technology to thwart foreign intelligence activities. Presently, the United States is concerned about its power and the interest one can access through security surveillance and counterintelligence. Both are subdivided into two but both are methods to gather information on potential threats in an environment that otherwise is not controlled by any authority.

The taxonomy of counterintelligence exists in a manner that it is classified into three categories which include strategic, tactical, and operational counterintelligence. For instance, Prunckun (2019) states that “the U.S. Marine Corps presents a taxonomy of counterintelligence along the lines of operations, investigations, collection & reporting, and analysis (dissemination and productions)” (p.26). On the other hand, the typology of counterintelligence depends on the areas of operations for the agency. Counterintelligence types may be based on the private sector, business, law enforcement, military, and national security. A good theory in counterintelligence should have falsifiability attributes, parsimony, and explanatory power. The grounded theory behind counterintelligence is based on strategic intelligence but there is a great vacuum in theory development within counterintelligence. The intelligent nature of counterintelligence work makes it difficult to protect its secrets especially when its feedback loop in both defensive and offensive operations has failures that can be difficult to address. Being offensive is the first commandment of counterintelligence which can be related to theoretical problems in the feedback loop within the founded theory; this commandment shows that defensive and passive strategies and tactics will fail if there is no appropriate offensive security (Olson, 2001). From a biblical perspective, leaders should conduct intelligence and counterintelligence services to provide a full detailed analysis of the nature of terrorism; this could help enhance security and safety within the public domain. The book of psalms says that “Your word is a lamp for my feet, a light on my path” (Psalm 119:105). Therefore, agencies and national security leaders should provide reliable and validated information concerning counterintelligence and terrorism; they should be the light for the public feet.

References

Agaga, S. E. (2018). Forensic Data Analytics for Counterintelligence & Facial Recognition in Criminal Investigation.

Bible Gateway passage: Psalm 119:105 – New international version. (n.d.). Bible Gateway. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Psalm%20119%3A105&version=NIV

Hayes, D. R., & Cappa, F. (2018). Open-source intelligence for risk assessment. Business Horizons, 61(5), 689-697.

Michael, R. R. (2021). TERRORISM AND ORGANIZED HATE CRIME: Intelligence Gathering, Analysis, and Investigations. ROUTLEDGE.

Olson, J.M., (2001). The 10 Commandments of Counterintelligence. https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/340145/modules/items/42199968

Prunckun, H. (2019). Counterintelligence theory and practice. Rowman & Littlefield.

Answer preview to The intelligence quadrangle entails the four main areas which include actions that need to be taken in producing knowledge

The intelligence quadrangle entails the four main areas which include actions that need to be taken in producing knowledge

APA
254 words

Get instant access to the full solution from yourhomeworksolutions by clicking the purchase button below

Place order

× Lets chat on whatsapp?