a marginal prosecution of a public figure as it relates to sentencing practices

Outline a case study of a marginal prosecution of a public figure as it relates to sentencing practices

The case of Senator Ted Stevens, who was prosecuted in 2008 for what is described in Introduction to Criminal Justice as “failing to report gifts” (Toobin, 2011, p. 143), is described in your textbook as exemplary of the “profoundly unjust use of government power against an individual” (ib.). In this assignment, you will have the opportunity to express your agreement or disagreement with this statement as you consider whether Stevens was treated any differently than other criminals due to his status as a public figure.

Write a paper in which you address the following questions:

Is it more or less difficult for judges and jurors to evaluate the guilt of public figures than that of typical criminals? Why?
In your opinion, what does the treatment of Stevens in this case reveal about the way court systems treat public figures?
Do you find Stevens guilty or innocent, and why? How would you assess the fairness of his sentence?

……Answer Preview………..

It is evident that public figures have more power than ordinary citizens. Based on the scenario of Senator Ted Stevens who was prosecuted in 2008, it is very evident that people who are in power can make it difficult for judges to evaluate their guilt because of their public figures. According to the book, it is very clear that Stevens was treated differently than other criminals (Toobin, 2008)………….

APA

324 words

A marginal prosecution of a public figure as it relates to sentencing practices

a marginal prosecution of a public figure as it relates to sentencing practices