Programme Evaluation Method and Evaluation
Logic Model Activity
Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients with COPD
Resources | Activities | Program Processes | Immediate Outcomes | Intermediate Outcomes | Long-term Outcomes |
1. Perceived competence.
2. Relatedness. 3. Controlled motivation. 4. Autonomous motivation.
|
1. Attending individual physiotherapy with professionals.
2. Cycling or riding a bicycle. 3. Exercising at the gym. 4. Running. 5. Walking. 6. Daily routines such as taking the stairs and household chores. 7. Electric bike riding. 8. Mobility scooter. 9. Aerobic training. 10. Resistance training. |
1. Time scheduling for exercising.
2. Understanding the best and less risky activities to perform. 3. Scheduling for the gym and physiotherapy sessions. 4. Developing a routine to avoid deteriorating physical health. 5. Seeking support from friends and family. 6. Maintaining a healthy lifestyle. |
1. Enjoyment and fun especially when in a group of similar patients or family members.
2. Physical relief from stress and anxiety. 3. Improves overall health. 4. Flexibility and ability to do routine daily chores. |
1. Reduced infection rates from common illnesses.
2. A strongest and resilient immune system. 3. Trust among couples, friend, and family. 4. Self-confidence and discipline to maintain a health fit lifestyle. |
1. Improves a patient’s ability for exercise tolerance.
2. Enhances the overall quality of life. 3. Patients get to live fully or in enjoyable ways rather than in constant pain. 4. Improvement in psychological and physiological symptoms. 5. Increase self-motivation that lead to a sense of self-efficacy. 6. Improved bonding and relationships with the family and friends. 7. Alleviates the stresses and depressions most patients have to cope with in life. |
Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation Program for Patients with Huntington’s disease
Resources | Activities | Program Processes | Immediate Outcomes | Intermediate Outcomes | Long-term Outcomes |
1. Motor function.
2. Gait and balance function. 3. MMSE cognitive function analysis. 4. UHDRS cognitive function analysis. 5. Body mass index. 6. Cognitive impairment for severe HD patients. 7. Lack of institutional follow up after rehabilitation of HD patients. 8. A multidisciplinary need for support. |
1. Physical health exercises.
2. Social activities. 3. Teaching sessions. 4. Taking group lessons. |
1. Scheduling for admission to in-patient stays for three weeks.
2. Scheduling around 8 hours of numerous activities during the weekdays. 3. Scheduling four hours of supervised activities in the weekend. 4. Training with occupational, speech, and physio- therapists. 5. Scheduling group training sessions at the gym. 6. Scheduling extra lessons at the swimming pool. 7. Scheduling patient education sessions and group discussions. 8. Integration of patient’s family members or friends in the program’s activities where possible or needed. |
1. Reduced anxiety and depressions as a result of physical and cognitive exercise.
2. Improved motor function allowing for higher levels of activities. 3. Reduced fatigue. 4. Enjoyment and fun. |
1. Enhanced motor functionality of patients.
2. Improved speech cognitive skills. 3. Motivation to maintain a health and fit lifestyle. 4. Better life quality. 5. Enhanced physical health improvements. 6. A reinforce immune system. 7. Ability to improve the numerous symptoms of the HD disorder especially for cognitive impairment. |
1. Improved quality of life in terms of personal opinions on everyday lifestyle and conditions.
2. Improved physical health with an increased body mass index. 3. Enhanced cognitive skills in mental and speech abilities. 4. Reduced stress and anxiety due to self-confidence and motivation resulting from an enhanced quality of life. |
Two Community Programs for Persons with Stroke
Resources | Activities | Program Processes | Immediate Outcomes | Intermediate Outcomes | Long-term Outcomes |
1. Reintegration to normal living.
2. Mobilizing social support. 3. Motivation to be physically active. 4. Confidence. 5. Exercise participation. 6. Developing coping skills. 7. Accessing resources.
|
1. Water-based exercise.
2. Motor function. 3. Walking. 4. Persona exercise goals. 5. Personal expectation. 6. Family integration in care giving sessions. 7. Land exercise. |
1. Scheduling for personal expectation and short term goals towards reintegration to the community after suffering a stroke.
2. Personally setting individual exercise goals for enhancing coping methods. 3. Planning to include the family in are giving sessions. 4. Social integration through community training exercises.
|
1. Social belonging and fulfillment.
2. Ability to interact and develop commitment to others. 3. Improved motor and physical function. 4. Ability to work and move freely without increased need of help. 5. Enjoyment and fun. |
1. Ability to strengthen social and family relationships.
2. Development of trust among community, group, and family members. 3. People get to exchange ideas on the coping skills. 4. Accomplishing short-term goals. 5. Gaining confidence and self-motivation. |
1. Self-efficacy develops over time enabling adherence to goals and requirements.
2. Promotes a strong social bond through community suppose and encouragement. 3. Improved physical and mental health from increased exercise. 4. Development of long-lasting relationships. 5. High level of activity through self-motivated exercise. 6. Access to information about stroke squeal, understanding a partner, and material. 7. Enhanced quality of live and improved confidence to live a positive and healthy life. |
References
Huijbregts, M. P., Myers, A. M., Streiner, D., &Teasell, R. (2015). Implementation, process, and preliminary outcome evaluation of two community programs for persons with stroke and their care partners. Topics in stroke rehabilitation.
Piira, A., Van Walsem, M. R., Mikalsen, G., Øie, L., Frich, J. C., &Knutsen, S. (2014). Effects of a Two-Year Intensive Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation Program for Patients with Huntington’s disease: a Prospective Intervention Study. PLoS currents, 6.
Stewart, K. F., Meis, J. J., van de Bool, C., Janssen, D. J., Kremers, S. P., &Schols, A. M. (2014). Maintenance of a physically active lifestyle after pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with COPD: a qualitative study toward motivational factors. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 15(9), 655-664.
…………………Answer Preview………………
Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients with COPD
The research depicts perceived competence based on the fact that the participants were taken through physical activities with the guidance of professionals. The physical activities aimed at ascertaining their participation in physical activities. The patients understood the less risky and best activities to be conducted. Despite this, social support was identified to be important to the respondents through help from fellow patients who were experienced. Thus the social support provided intensified the enjoyable of the physical practices. Despite this, the outcome was instant as the patients were having fun with the practices as they were together with other patients. The intermediate results were related to the benefits……………….
APA
301 Words