Control of Microbial Growth – Effect of Ultraviolet Light
Lab Report #6: Control of Microbial Growth – Effect of Ultraviolet Light
Start Assignment
1. Complete the virtual lab in MH Connect.
2 Write your lab report in essay format. Your report must include the following in 1-2 pages:
Introduction
Hypothesis
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Resources
How to Write your Lab Report: http://track.smtpsendemail.com/9064971/c?p=qFuBJB94ARlFEnUVnC6x6jv7MFhp_jmsNxrYnMy0vcBrZWhDFPhPFGjfljz5RuRPh6hZ5mvU6sBeV_zNfdetCDmInitCFirX16aK1FlMa_p9P7XB_CvICTV3_858pJtOkCAWY75y6z-N8Xnqzx7XD4wZnjIqxHWg7vrTZd2FcUJUEDdhZp6zv7Gmef2VTOU4Xm625PRF1I9n4iBaEyJTCMsm99mSalMQ1eEBqpZiCMk= (Links to an external site.)
Grading Rubric:
View grading rubric below.
Submission Guidelines
Only doc, docx, and odt file types are accepted – PDF files and GOOGLE docs are not accepted. You may download Microsoft Office for free under Pages.
Rubric
MIC101 Lab Report Grading Rubric 20points
MIC101 Lab Report Grading Rubric 20points
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Introduction
2 to >1.8 pts
Full Marks
Background information is completely accurate Background information has the appropriate level of specificity to provide concise and useful context to aid the reader’s understanding. Primary literature references are relevant, adequately explained, and indicate a reasonable literature search.
1.8 to >1.5 pts
Partial
Background omits information or contains inaccuracies which detract from the major point of the paper. Background information is overly narrow or overly general (only partially relevant). Primary literature references, if present, are inadequately explained.
1.5 to >0 pts
No Marks
Background information is missing or contains major inaccuracies. Background information is accurate, but irrelevant or too disjointed to make relevance clear Primary literature references are absent or irrelevant.
2 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Hypothesis
4 to >2.0 pts
Full Marks
Hypotheses are novel, insightful, or actually have the potential to contribute useful new knowledge to the field.
2 to >0.0 pts
Partial
Hypotheses are plausible and appropriate though likely or clearly taken directly from course material.
0 pts
No Marks
Hypotheses are trivial, obvious, incorrect or completely off topic.
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Methods
3 to >1.5 pts
Full Marks
Appropriate. Clearly explained. A synthesis of multiple previous approaches or an entirely new approach
1.5 to >0.0 pts
Partial
Drawn directly from coursework Not modified where appropriate
0 pts
No Marks
Inappropriate Poorly explained /indecipherable
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Results
3 to >1.5 pts
Full Marks
Data are relevant, accurate and comprehensive. Reader can fully evaluate validity of writer’s conclusions and assumptions. Data may be synthesized or manipulated in a novel way to provide additional insight.
1.5 to >0.0 pts
Partial
At least one relevant dataset per hypothesis is provided but some necessary data are missing or inaccurate Reader can satisfactorily evaluate some but not all of writer’s conclusions.
0 pts
No Marks
Data are too incomplete or haphazard to provide a reasonable basis for testing the hypothesis
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Conclusion
5 to >3.34 pts
Full Marks
Conclusions are completely justified by data. Connections between hypothesis, data, and conclusions are comprehensive and persuasive.
3.34 to >0.0 pts
Partial
Conclusions have some direct basis in the data, but may contain some gaps in logic or data or are overly broad. Connections between hypothesis, data and conclusions are present but weak.
0 pts
No Marks
Conclusions have little or no basis in data provided. Connections between hypothesis, data and conclusion are non- existent, limited, vague or otherwise insufficient to allow reasonable evaluation of their merit.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Page Requirements
3 to >2.01 pts
Full Marks
1-2 pages
2.01 to >0.0 pts
Partial
1 page or less
Answer preview to Control of Microbial Growth – Effect of Ultraviolet Light
APA
524 words
Get instant access to the full solution from yourhomeworksolutions by clicking the purchase button below