Home » Downloads » Walter and Sally’s main differences are that Walter did not have a research background following his graduate program

Walter and Sally’s main differences are that Walter did not have a research background following his graduate program

Walter and Sally’s main differences are that Walter did not have a research background following his graduate program

Walter and Sally\’s main differences are that Walter did not have a research background following his graduate program, and Sally did. Sally was able to use her research skills to flourish on the assignment. Sally showed critical thinking examples by using metacognitive strategies to confirm her thinking process (Berger et al., 2020). Walter was confused from the beginning, and his lack of research traits made it difficult for him to proceed with his first assignment.

The most significant mistakes that occurred were from Walter. Walter made several mistakes within his doctoral journey. Sally\’s one mistake was that she relied on a book being mailed to her to complete her research. In my opinion, there could be plenty of other books and peer-reviewed articles that she could have used to back up her assumptions.

I can avoid making these mistakes by knowing what my research interests are, thinking extensively and critically, knowing what is expected, managing my time and priorities, being resourceful, working ahead, and being engaged with my cohort, faculty, and university (Karp, 2009).

Dissertation Diane was most likely able to graduate and complete her dissertation promptly because she was constantly engaged and followed an aggressive dissertation timeline. Additionally, she correctly understood and utilized the peer-review process, incorporated it, worked ahead, used available resources, and mastered time management (Berger et al., 2020). I can integrate all of these tools by being organized and by following a schedule.

 

 

——————————————-

 

After reading the vignette assigned for this week’s discussion, I was able to identify a few differences amongst Walter and Sally. One being their prior affiliation with research. Walter was not as acquainted with the process of research, as Sally was due to her previous program requirements. Another key difference between both Sally and Walter were their preparation style for the required assignment. Sally began her research prior to engaging in the assignment to grasp a better understanding, while Walter assumed that he would develop the knowledge as he proceeded forward.

Both Sally and Walter made the mistake of utilizing the internet rather than scholarly peer reviewed journal entries to gather data needed for the assignment. To properly avoid making the same mistake, I would only utilize scholarly search engines and verify that the information accurately aligns with the expectation of the program as well as the assignment.

Perhaps dissertation Diane was able to complete the program much quicker than Walter and Sally because, she quickly adapted to her new identity as scholar. She was consistent with properly collecting data for her dissertation. She implemented feedback she received from her instructors and lastly, she maintained a sense of community among her instructors and peers (Garcia & Yao, 2019). These are ways I intend to develop as a scholarly writer and successfully complete my dissertation in a timely matter. The most challenging yet the most beneficial is building a sense of community through the online portal. Garcia & Yao (2019), “indicate that first year online doctoral students,” work to build connections and community to create a sense of belonging, which can ultimately lead to overall success within the program (p. 12).

 

———————————-

 

Since I have begun my academic studies, I have always utilized educational support systems. I used BBLearn as my LMS for my undergraduate and graduate program, and I am very familiar with it. I was disappointed that Grand Canyon University does not use the same program. I utilized Google Docs, Google Slides, Prezi, Excel, and many other writing tools in my graduate program. I prefer Google Docs since documents can be saved by the second. When I turn in an assignment, I download it as a word document from Google Docs; this way, I have my work saved in two places.

For this program, I want to perfect my use of technology literacy concerning using learning management systems and proper search engines for my future research (Berger et al., 2020). I believe I have a slight advantage with being a digital native, and I was born in 1997; therefore, I am confident in my abilities to use multiple types of technology. I have also never used LoudCloud as an LMS; due to this, I want to familiarize myself with this software before moving forward with this program.

With furthering my research, I have come across an article that gives tips on researching and finding peer-reviewed articles correctly. The article on calibrating confidence in research findings main tips are (1) developing good intuitions about effect sizes and sample sizes, (2) different strategies for a planned study, (3) strategies for existing studies, (4) understanding data-dependent decisions and the type I error rate, (5) distinguishing between data-dependent and data-independent analysis with a pre-analysis plan, and (6) distinguishing between different varieties of preregistration and their respective functions (Da Silva Frost & Ledgerwood, 2020). I want to utilize this article while researching my dissertation, and I believe it is a valuable tool. I hope it helps others in my cohort as well.

 

———————————————

 

 

It is with resignation and resolve that I admit I am a digital immigrant. However, my immigrant status does not establish me as a digital ignoramus. As our course text explains (Grand Canyon University [GCU], 2020), many students in research communities today, were born in a time when the use of technology is as second nature as breathing. As a digital immigrant, I may be slower to understand the technologies, but I am not slower to embrace them as I find them incredibly useful.

I conducted high school research projects in the library with a card catalog. However, by the time I started research for my undergraduate degrees, ERIC was available in the library, at monitored kiosks, and my journey into online research began. Research for my master’s thesis was a hybrid of library searches and the online journal catalog. Over the years I have taken many continuing education classes in an online format have come to appreciate the interactions created by online communities.

As I begin my doctoral journey I have already discovered two very important technological elements to keep me on track. First, technology is what will allow me to be organized with my research. Organized research will assist in keeping an organized mind. I have a thumb drive with a folder for each class and within those topic folders for each subject. I am learning to use RefWorks to categorize usable research for my dissertation to save time hunting and searching for it later. Second, my preliminary research in to my area of interest has demonstrated to me that once I find a useful article, many other articles and keywords are linked to it digitally, allowing me to shift direction in my research with a simple click of a link. Sometimes, utilizing someone else’s search terms can open up a whole new direction for your online search.

Answer preview to Walter and Sally’s main differences are that Walter did not have a research background following his graduate program

Walter and Sally's main differences are that Walter did not have a research background following his graduate program

APA

605 words

Get instant access to the full solution from yourhomeworksolutions by clicking the purchase button below