Compare the military policy considerations to the survivor account of the bombing of Hiroshima
Compare the military policy considerations to the survivor account of the bombing of Hiroshima (Sources, 30-4 and 30-5).
How did they differ?
How does reading both complicate our understanding of the past?
Is it possible, from our perspective, to judge the use of atomic weapons in 1945 as moral or immoral?
References:
A History of World Societies, Volume 2 (11th Edition) Sources of World Societies, Volume 2 (3rd Edition)
Answer preview to compare the military policy considerations to the survivor account of the bombing of Hiroshima
APA
498 words