How could Aristotle take this particular stance when he could not have possibly known the outcome women or slaves
Question 1: Aristotle believes that some, at birth, are destined to rule and others are marked out to be ruled over and sees this not only as necessary, but expedient. Furthermore, Aristotle argues that if a man is not able to live in Society or has no need because he is self sufficient then he has no place belonging to a state. But how could Aristotle take this particular stance when he could not have possibly known the outcome women or slaves, for example, governing themselves? Not because they did not have the capability, but did not have the opportunity of doing so.
Rasheen Underwood 9/12/2019 – Question 2: When Aristotle refers to man as beasts and/or God’s he is essentially implying that if any man takes what he needs by force, that man is acting as a wild animal and if any man that magically materialize his needs as a God would, instead of seeking help from his greater society or his rulers, he is obviously nothing short than immortal, God-like, or from a different earthly species/i.e beasts. Although human animals are inherently social, according to Aristotle, humans are not necessarily one hundred percent dependent on the greater society and of our peers, especially when it comes to our survival and livelihoods. Moreover, I often wonder if Aristotle was still around today, would he continue to believe that groups of people that are no longer solely ruled by the “ruling elites” in society would be considered “Beats or Gods” now that they are responsible for governing themselves and their own destinies?
just an example for the questions. each questions must be 4-6 sentences.
file:///C:/Users/enyuc/OneDrive/Desktop/Rousseau%20(2002)%20-The%20Social%20Contract%20&%20the%20Two%20Discourses%20(Yale).pdf
so from this link
Rousseau, Discourses on Inequality (87-119)ACTIONS
file:///C:/Users/enyuc/OneDrive/Desktop/Rousseau%20(2002)%20-The%20Social%20Contract%20&%20the%20Two%20Discourses%20(Yale)-1.pdf
Rousseau, Social Contract, Books I-II (155-183 but be careful to page they might be confusing
Answer preview to how could Aristotle take this particular stance when he could not have possibly known the outcome women or slaves
APA
261 words
Get instant access to the full solution from yourhomeworksolutions by clicking the purchase button below