How does Howard Zinn’s approach differ from traditional approaches to the study of American History
How does Howard Zinn’s approach differ from traditional approaches to the study of American History?
What did you learn from Zinn’s approach that you do not learn from other studies of American history?
Who/what does Zinn emphasize in his study? Who does he say is left out of America’s “official history”?
Would you recommend A People’s History of the United States to someone wishing to learn about American history? Why/Why not?
Answer preview to how does Howard Zinn’s approach differ from traditional approaches to the study of American History
APA
602 words