Which seems more plausible to you and why? How broad is their scope

Which seems more plausible to you and why? How broad is their scope

Complete the following comparative essay based on two articles. (MLA Format)

I have started a a comparative essay on these two articles. First one is on the origins of southern food and the other is where “Tex-mex” food came from. My request is for you to complete this assignment into an A+ comparative essay, you may find the initial draft below. MLA.

3 more pages (including the reference page) will be more than sufficient.

Articles:

Prompt – https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2017/06/11/532086897/grappling-with-race-class-and-southern-foods-great-debt-of-pleasure

To Compare – https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/food/tex-mex-cooking-its-not-mexican-and-maybe-thats-the-point/2014/01/27/577c515c-850a-11e3-9dd4-e7278db80d86_story.html?utm_term=.17218016be43

Questions to keep in mind when you are writing the Comparison paper:

What are they (the 2 texts) about?

Did they originate at some particular time?

Who created them? Who uses or defends them? Or, more broadly, who does it appeal to?

What is the central focus, claim, or goal of each? What conclusions do they offer? What are the points of comparisons you can draw from them?

How are they applied to situations/people/things/etc.?

Which seems more plausible to you, and why? How broad is their scope?

What kind of evidence is offered from each of them?

paper_2__draft1_____uriel_beltran__n00280284_

Answer preview to which seems more plausible to you and why? How broad is their scope

APA

1063 words

Get instant access to the full solution from yourhomeworksolutions by clicking the purchase button below

$12.00 – Purchase Checkout Added to cart