Give your opinion as to whether or not physical servers are more secure than virtualized counterparts when companies

Give your opinion as to whether or not physical servers are more secure than virtualized counterparts when companies

Give your opinion as to whether or not physical servers are more secure than virtualized counterparts when companies are deploying virtualization technologies to increase operational efficiency, gain higher server utilization, and attain more efficient power utilization. Justify your response.

Choose three (3) open systems interconnection (OSI) layers and determine the main security risks involved at each layer in using technology where the hypervisor is installed on a chip and on the guest OSI. Next, decide which architecture you believe is most prone to attacks. Justify your response.

……………..Answer Preview……………….

I disagree with the fact that physical server are more secure than virtualized counterparts when a company want to improve its performance and utilize power. This because physical sever cannot run multiple task at the same time, but when the server is virtualized it’s capable of running many programs at the same time in a single sever. Therefore utilization counterpart helps in reducing the number of servers used to carry out job roles thus reducing the amount of power consumed. Another thing is when using virtualized counterpart it’s easier to discover an error since its capable of restarting ….

APA

368 words

Get instant access to the full solution from yourhomeworksolutions by clicking the purchase button below